Charlie Chaplin vs. America - When Art, Sex, and Politics Collided
Reduzierte Artikel in dieser Kategorie
8,99 €
| Verlag | Simon & Schuster US |
| Auflage | 2023 |
| Seiten | 432 |
| Format | 15,8 x 23,4 x 3,8 cm |
| Hardback | |
| Gewicht | 655 g |
| Artikeltyp | Englisches Buch |
| EAN | 9781982176358 |
| Bestell-Nr | 98217635UA |
The story of Charlie Chaplin's years of self-imposed exile from the United States, when he had become a pariah during the 1950s Red Scare. While living abroad he made his last, and by general agreement, worst films, only to return home years later to a triumphant reception.
Klappentext:
The remarkable, must-read story of Charlie Chaplin's years of exile from the United States during the postwar Red Scare, and how it ruined his film career, from bestselling biographer Scott Eyman.
Bestselling Hollywood biographer and film historian Scott Eyman tells the story of Charlie Chaplin's fall from grace. In the aftermath of World War Two, Chaplin was criticized for being politically liberal and internationalist in outlook. He had never become a US citizen, something that would be held against him as xenophobia set in when the postwar Red Scare took hold.
Politics aside, Chaplin had another problem: his sexual interest in young women. He had been married three times and had had numerous affairs. In the 1940s, he was the subject of a paternity suit, which he lost, despite blood tests that proved he was not the father. His sexuality became a convenient way for those who opposed his politics to condemn him. Refused permission to return to the US from a trip abr oad, he settled in Switzerland, and made his last two films in London
In Charlie Chaplin vs. America, bestselling author Scott Eyman explores the life and times of the movie genius who brought us such masterpieces as City Lights and Modern Times. This is a perceptive, insightful portrait of Chaplin and of an America consumed by political turmoil.
Rezension:
""Fun to read. . . . Eyman is completely sympathetic to Chaplin, and he makes the case that we should be, too." Louis Menand The New Yorker
